Open Access

Bacterial and fungal community composition across the soil depth profiles in a fallow field

  • Daegeun Ko1,
  • Gayoung Yoo2,
  • Seong-Taek Yun3,
  • Seong-Chun Jun4 and
  • Haegeun Chung1Email author
Journal of Ecology and Environment201741:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-017-0053-0

Received: 24 May 2017

Accepted: 7 September 2017

Published: 19 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Soil microorganisms play key roles in nutrient cycling and are distributed throughout the soil profile. Currently, there is little information about the characteristics of the microbial communities along the soil depth because most studies focus on microorganisms inhabiting the soil surface. To better understand the functions and composition of microbial communities and the biogeochemical factors that shape them at different soil depths, we analyzed microbial activities and bacterial and fungal community composition in soils up to a 120 cm depth at a fallow field located in central Korea. To examine the vertical difference of microbial activities and community composition, β-1,4-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-1,4-xylosidase, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase, and acid phosphatase activities were analyzed and barcoded pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes (bacteria) and internal transcribed spacer region (fungi) was conducted.

Results

The activity of all the soil enzymes analyzed, along with soil C concentration, declined with soil depth. For example, acid phosphatase activity was 125.9 (± 5.7 (± 1 SE)), 30.9 (± 0.9), 15.7 (± 0.6), 6.7 (± 0.9), and 3.3 (± 0.3) nmol g−1 h−1 at 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm soil depths, respectively. Among the bacterial groups, the abundance of Proteobacteria (38.5, 23.2, 23.3, 26.1, and 17.5% at 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm soil depths, respectively) and Firmicutes (12.8, 11.3, 8.6, 4.3, and 0.4% at 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm soil depths, respectively) decreased with soil depth. On the other hand, the abundance of Ascomycota (51.2, 48.6, 65.7, 46.1, and 45.7% at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 cm depths, respectively), a dominant fungal group at this site, showed no clear trend along the soil profile.

Conclusions

Our results show that soil C availability can determine soil enzyme activity at different soil depths and that bacterial communities have a clear trend along the soil depth at this study site. These metagenomics studies, along with other studies on microbial functions, are expected to enhance our understanding on the complexity of soil microbial communities and their relationship with biogeochemical factors.

Keywords

Soil enzymes Pyrosequencing Microbial community composition Diversity

Background

Soil microorganisms play an essential role in mediating nutrient cycling in the terrestrial ecosystem by decomposition of organic matters and transformation of inorganic compounds (Nannipieri et al. 2003, Xu et al. 2013, Sengupta and Dick 2015). Although soil microorganisms are present throughout the soil profile, our understanding of the composition of microbial communities at different soil depths is still insufficient. Majority of studies on soil microorganisms have focused on those inhabiting the topsoil (~ 25 cm of the soil surface) where organic matter content and the abundance of soil microorganisms are high (Fierer et al. 2003, Eilers et al. 2012). Despite the fact that large numbers of microorganisms exist at deeper soil profiles, the characteristics of these communities and the distributions of microorganisms along the soil profiles remain less understood (Blume et al. 2002, Fierer et al. 2003, Eilers et al. 2012).

The microbial communities inhabiting subsurface soil layers are known to have a greater influence on the process of soil formation compared to those at the topsoil (Buss et al. 2005). In addition, subsurface soil microbial communities may play an important role in soil C sequestration since large amounts of organic C with long turnover times are stored in the subsurface horizons (Trumbore 2000, Fierer et al. 2005, Rumpel and Kogel-Knabner 2011). Therefore, determining the composition and characteristics of microbial communities at different soil depths will allow us to understand the important subsurface soil processes.

Significant differences in microbial community composition and function at different soil depths have been reported (Hansel et al. 2008, Will et al. 2010, Eilers et al. 2012). The diversity of microorganisms typically decreases with depth, whether diversity is determined by phospholipid fatty acid profiles (Fierer et al. 2003), DNA fingerprinting (LaMontagne et al. 2003, Agnelli et al. 2004, Goberna et al. 2005), 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences (Will et al. 2010), or internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of the rRNA (Baldrian et al. 2012). This is due to changes in edaphic factors such as pH, moisture contents, the quality and quantity of organic matters, and O2 concentrations throughout the soil depth profile. There is still little information on whether certain bacterial or fungal taxa are limited to specific soil depths and how that may relate to distinct microbial functions at different soil depths (Eilers et al. 2012).

Here, we analyzed the soil enzyme activities and used barcoded pyrosequencing to understand differences in the function and composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities at different soil depth in a fallow field located in central Korea. Our objective was to determine the differences in soil microbial community composition and function along the soil depth at this site.

Methods

Site description and sampling

The study site is a fallow field located in Eumsung-gun, North Chungcheong Province, in the central region of Korea (36° 57′ 36.54″ N 127° 27′ 59.80″ E). The site is situated on a small hillock area in the uppermost stream of Mihocheon, a primary tributary of the Geum River. The site is a fallow dry field surrounded by rice paddies. Within this site (60 m × 20 m), eight soil samples were collected in September 2014 to a depth of 120 cm using a manual geoprobe. These samples were classified to five different depths: 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm. In our study, results of analyses of soils from one sampling point are reported because the soil enzyme activity at the other sampling points was too low for meaningful study on microbial activity and community composition to be conducted. Soil physicochemical properties including pH, total C and N concentrations, and soil texture were determined.

Soil enzyme activity

To determine microbial community metabolism, fluorometric assays using methylumbelliferone (MUB)-linked substrates were performed. The activities of β-1,4-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-1,4-xylosidase, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase, and acid phosphatase were analyzed which are extracellular enzymes that degrade cellulose, hemicellulose, chitin, and organic P substrate in soil (Saiya-Cork et al. 2002). Two grams of soil was placed in 125 ml of sodium acetate buffer, and then, the slurry was transferred to a 96-well microplate that included eight analytical replicates of each enzyme assay. Plates for all five enzymes were incubated at the room temperature for 2 h. Fluorescence was measured using a Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA), in which the excitation energy was set at 360 nm and emission was measured at 460 nm. Enzyme activity was expressed as nmol 4-MUB g−1 h−1.

DNA extraction, PCR, and pyrosequencing

DNA was extracted from the soil samples using the FastDNA SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals, OH, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was amplified via PCR with the universal primers that target V1 to V3 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The primers used to amplify the 16S rRNA genes for bacteria were 27F (5′-GAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 518R (5′-WTTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′). For fungal amplification, barcoded primers of ITS3F (5′-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′) and ITS4R (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) were used. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and the non-target products were removed employing Ampure beads kit (Agencourt Bioscience, MA, USA). The quality and product size were analyzed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) employing a DNA 7500 chip. Emulsion PCR was conducted on the mixed amplicons, and the sequencing was performed at Chunlab, Inc. (Seoul, Korea) using GS Junior Sequencing System (Roche, Branford, CT, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Pyrosequencing data analysis

Pyrosequencing data were analyzed following the descriptions in previous studies (Chun et al. 2010, Hur et al. 2011, Kim et al. 2012a). Reads obtained were sorted according to unique barcodes of the PCR products. Potential chimera sequences were identified via the Bellerophone method (Huber et al. 2004) and subsequently removed. Each read was then taxonomically classified according to the EzTaxon-e database (http://ezbiocloud.net/taxonomy) (Kim et al. 2012b). Sample richness and diversity were determined via Chao1 estimation and Shannon diversity index at the 3% distance. The phylogenetic distance between the microbial communities was estimated and visualized by the Fast UniFrac (Hamady et al. 2010) and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). Shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained by taxon exclusive-OR (XOR) analysis of CL community program (Chunlab Inc., Seoul, Korea), and OTUs between the samples were compared. Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was constructed, and the similarity between the soil samples from different depths was estimated.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the effect of soil depths on each soil enzyme. Scheffe’s post hoc test was used in the case of multiple comparisons to detect the mean differences among different groups. Significance for the statistical analysis was accepted at α = 0.05. In addition, to understand the relationship between the soil physicochemical properties and soil microbial characteristics including catabolic activities and dominant bacterial and fungal taxa, correlation analyses were performed. Both analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Soil enzyme activity and physicochemical properties

The activity of five soil extracellular enzymes, acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-1,4-glucosidase, and β-1,4-xylosidase, was highest at the 0–15 cm depth. Soil enzyme activity decreased with depth (p < 0.001), decreasing by one to two orders of magnitude from the topsoil to the soil at 90–120 cm depth, and this trend was observed for all five enzymes (Fig. 1). The soil was sandy loam, and soil chemical properties varied with depth (Table 1). More specifically, soil total C and N concentrations decreased with depth, and also, C/N ratio decreased with depth. Soil pH and moisture content ranged from 5.56 to 6.06 and 16 to 19%, respectively. As expected, soil enzyme activity was significantly correlated with soil physicochemical characteristics. For example, all five soil enzymes were positively correlated with total C and total N concentrations (r > 0.87, p < 0.01). In addition, acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-1,4-glucosidase were positively correlated with soil pH (r > 0.52, p < 0.05), and acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, and β-1,4-xylosidase with soil moisture content (r > 0.53, p < 0.05).
Fig. 1

Activity (mean ± one standard error, n = 3) of five soil enzymes: a acid phosphatase, b N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, c cellobiohydrolase, d β-1,4-glucosidase, and e β-1,4-xylosidase along the soil depth. The different letters within the graph indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in the enzyme activity with soil depth

Table 1

Soil geochemical properties along the depth profiles

Soil depth (cm)

Soil chemical properties

pH

Total nitrogen (g N kg−1 soil)

Total carbon (g C kg−1 soil)

C/N ratio

Soil moisture content (%)

0–15

6.06

0.21

9.68

46.1

18.8

15–30

5.56

0.16

3.92

24.5

18.6

30–60

5.58

0.10

2.09

20.9

17.3

60–90

5.92

0.10

2.45

24.5

16.5

90–120

5.87

0.07

2.19

31.3

18.3

Soil microbial diversity

After removing low-quality sequences, a total of 50,357 bacterial 16S rRNA sequences and 38,546 fungal ITS sequences were obtained. Across all samples, 11,032 bacterial OTUs and 2928 fungal OTUs were observed. To determine rarefaction curves, richness, and diversity of bacteria and fungi, OTUs were identified at 97% of genetic similarity. Analyses of rarefaction with OTU numbers for bacterial and fungal communities determined by richness estimators Ace and Chao1 revealed that 44 to 73% and 60 to 81% of the estimated taxonomic richness, respectively, were not saturated (Fig. 2). In addition, these were recovered by the sequencing effort especially in fungal communities at soil depths of 30–60 and 60–90 cm. Therefore, in this study, the extent of taxonomic diversity at this genetic distance was not fully surveyed, but considerable fractions of both bacterial and fungal diversity within soil depths were assessed at the species level by the surveying effort (Fig. 2, Table 2).
Fig. 2

Differences in rarefaction curves at 97% sequence similarity along the soil depth for a bacterial and b fungal communities

Table 2

Summary of number and diversity index of microbial communities at different soil depths

 

Bacteria

Fungi

Soil depth (cm)

Soil depth (cm)

0–15

15–30

30–60

60–90

90–120

0–15

15–30

30–60

60–90

90–120

Total number of sequence reads

5735

7238

10,438

20,663

6805

9710

10,497

10,471

8261

1645

Number of OTUs (using CD-HIT)

1789

1809

2218

3451

1765

654

779

653

593

249

Ace

4023

2914

4428

4706

3561

1090

982

807

739

325

Chao1

3190

2785

3442

4810

2776

908

979

814

762

311

JackKnife

4844

3466

4205

6940

3398

1030

1106

861

6694

330

Shannon

6.8

6.7

6.7

7.2

6.7

4.5

5.1

4.8

4.9

4.5

Simpson

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.002

0.002

0.039

0.017

0.032

0.030

0.036

Chao1 richness estimates of bacterial communities at 3% genetic distance across all soil depth was 3400 (± 837). It was highest at 60–90 cm depth and lowest at 90–120 cm depth (4810 vs. 2776). On the other hand, Chao1 estimates were 754 (± 262) across all soil depths and it was highest at the 15–30 cm depth and lowest at the 90–120 cm depth (979 vs. 311). The richness was significantly higher in bacterial than in fungal communities. At the 3% genetic dissimilarity level, the Shannon index ranged from 6.7 to 7.2 and 4.5 to 5.1 in bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. In bacterial communities, the Shannon index was highest at 60–90 cm depth, whereas it was highest at 15–30 cm depth in fungal communities (Table 2).

Bacterial and fungal community composition along the soil depths

The 50,357 sequences classified below the domain level were affiliated to 42 bacterial phyla. Across all samples, the abundance of bacterial phyla Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes was 28, 26, 11, 8, and 7%, respectively, of all the sequences assigned to the domain Bacteria (Fig. 3a). The members of rare phyla, of which the abundance was less than 1% of all classified 16S rRNA sequences, included Armatimonadetes, Elusimicrobia, OD1, MATCR, WS3, OP11, TM6, Chlorobi, Bacteria_uc, WS5, OP3, Deferribacteres, Fibrobacteres, GN02, BRC1, Tenericutes, Spirochaetes, GN04, Fusobacteria, A3DB, and unclassified phyla.
Fig. 3

Relative read abundance of the a bacterial and b fungal phyla at five different soil depths. Sequences unable to be classified into any known group were assigned to “Etc”

There were strong patterns in bacterial community composition along the soil depth. More specifically, the phylum Acidobacteria was dominant (52%) at 90–120 cm depth, whereas its abundance was lowest (16%) at 0–15 cm depth. On the other hand, Proteobacteria was dominant (39%) at the surface soil (0–15 cm depth), but its abundance was lowest (17%) at 90–120 cm depth. The Actinobacteria was dominant (16%) at the 60–90 cm depth but its abundance was lowest (4%) at the 90–120 cm depth. Chloroflexi was relatively evenly distributed along the depths, ranging from 7.0 to 9.2%, but it was higher in the interspace soils (30–90 cm depth). Firmicutes richness decreased along the soil depths (Figs. 3a and 4a). At the finer taxonomic scales, the most abundant bacterial class included Solibacteres and Acidobacteria_c for the phylum Acidobacteria. Abundance of the classes within Proteobacteria showed a tendency to decline along the soil depths, and this was observed for alpha, beta, delta, and gamma classes. In addition, the abundance of Clostridia, Bacilli, and Erysipelotrichi, classes of Firmicutes, decreased along the soil depths (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 4

Similarity of phylogenetic diversity at the phylum level (75% sequence similarity) for a bacterial and b fungal communities. The hierarchical relationship was obtained via the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering dendrogram

Fig. 5

Similarity of phylogenetic diversity at the class level (80% sequence similarity) for a bacterial and b fungal communities. The hierarchical relationship was obtained using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering dendrogram

The abundance of major bacterial groups was significantly correlated with soil physicochemical characteristics and enzyme activity. More specifically, the abundance of Proteobacteria was positively correlated with total soil C concentration (r = 0.92, p < 0.01), N concentration (r = 0.86, p < 0.01), and soil pH (r = 0.57, p < 0.05). It was also positively correlated with the activity of all five soil enzymes (r > 0.92, p < 0.01). The abundance of Firmicutes was also positively correlated with total soil C concentration (r = 0.73, p < 0.01), N concentration (r = 0.89, p < 0.01), and the activity of all five soil enzymes (r > 0.69, p < 0.01). On the other hand, the abundance of Acidobacteria was negatively correlated with total soil C concentration (r = − 0.61, p < 0.05) and N concentration (r = − 0.66, p < 0.01). In addition, it was negatively correlated with the activity of all five soil enzymes (− 0.65 < r < − 0.61, p < 0.05). The abundance of Chloroflexi was also negatively correlated with total soil C concentration (r = − 0.56, p < 0.05), N concentration (r = −0.57, p < 0.05), soil moisture content (r = − 0.99, p < 0.01), and the activity of acid phosphatase (r = − 0.57, p < 0.05) and β-1,4-xylosidase (r = − 0.53, p < 0.05).

In the bacterial dendrogram (Figs. 4a and 5a), the soils of interspace (15–90 cm) harbored bacterial communities with 97% similarity and they were differentiated from the top (0–15 cm) and deepest soil (90–120 cm) at similarity levels of 97 and 96%, respectively. The bacterial communities of 15–30 and 30–60 cm soil depths formed clusters, and they showed a similarity of 98%. To further examine differences of bacterial communities between soil depths, principal coordinates analysis was performed with diversity estimate indices, and all five depths were separated from each other (Fig. 6a).
Fig. 6

Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of a bacterial and b fungal communities using the diversity estimate indices

The 38,546 sequences classified below the domain level were affiliated to 13 fungal phyla. In comparison to the abundance of bacterial groups such as Proteobacteria and Firmicutes that declined along the soil depth and Acidobacteria and Nitrospirae that increased along the soil depth, fungal communities showed less clear trend in their composition along the soil profile. The fungal phyla that existed across all samples were Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellales, Fungi_uc, and Glomeromycota, and their abundance was 56, 27, 6, 5, and 3%, respectively, of all the sequences assigned to the domain Fungi (Fig. 3b). The members of rare phyla (less than 1% of all classified ITS sequences) included Endogonales, Blastocladiomycota, Monoblepharidomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Cryptomycota, and Olpidiaceae. The abundance of phylum Ascomycota was highest (71%) in the interspace soils (30–60 cm depth) but that of Basidiomycota was lowest (8%) at this depth (Fig. 4b). At the finer taxonomic scales, the most abundant fungal class included Sordariomycetes for phylum Ascomycota and Agaricomycetes within Basidiomycota. The abundance of the classes Sordariomycetes and Tremellomycetes of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota showed a tendency to decrease with soil depth, while the class Eurotiomycetes of Ascomycota increased with soil depth (Fig. 5b).

The abundance of major fungal groups was significantly correlated with soil pH and moisture, but not with enzyme activity. For example, the abundance of Basidiomycota was positively correlated with soil pH (r = 0.65, p < 0.01). In addition, the abundance of Mortierellales was positively correlated with soil moisture (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). On the other hand, the abundance of Fungi_uc was negatively correlated with soil moisture (r = − 0.75, p < 0.01).

In the fungal dendrogram (Figs. 4b and 5b), the soils of surface depths (0–30 cm) harbored fungal communities with 97% similarity and they formed a cluster. This cluster was differentiated from the fungal communities of 30–60, 60–90, and 90–120 cm soil depths. Unlike the PCoA result of bacterial communities, fungal communities at different soil depths were separated into three groups. More specifically, fungal communities of 0–15, 15–30, 30–60 cm soil depths were clustered while those of 60–90 cm and 90–120 cm depths were separated (Fig. 6b).

Discussion

Soil enzyme activity decreased with soil depth, and this is consistent with the decrease in total C and N concentrations (Table 1). There were significant differences in soil enzyme activities along the soil depth, and the soils with highest enzyme activity were 40- to 300-fold higher than soils with the lowest activity (Fig. 1). High concentrations of total C and N in the topsoil (0–15 cm) is likely to account for this pattern observed for soil enzyme activities (Stursova and Baldrian 2011); all five soil enzymes analyzed were positively correlated with soil C and N contents. Moreover, the observed changes in microbial activity through the soil profiles parallel those reported in another study (Baldrian et al. 2012). The previous study has documented that the activities of several enzymes hydrolyzing cellulose, hemicellulose, and chitin were significantly higher in the topsoil (1–4 cm thick litter horizon, ranging from 5.3 ± 2.2 to 26.5 ± 10.4 μmol g−1 min−1). In comparison to forest ecosystem studies, the soils in our study site have very low concentrations of organic matter, but the trend observed is similar. In addition, positive correlation was found between the activity of enzymes that degrade organic phosphate molecules, cellulose, and chitin and soil pH, and this was also the case with these enzymes and soil moisture content; these results suggest that soil physicochemical characteristics that change at different soil depths determine soil enzyme activity.

The observed changes in the abundances of bacterial groups were consistent with the differences in C availability, which indicates that C availability to soil microorganisms shapes microbial communities. Among soil bacterial taxa, the abundance of specific groups including Acidobacteria, β-Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes has been known to be significantly correlated with organic C availability to microorganisms and C mineralization rate. For example, a study conducted on soils collected from 71 sites within diverse ecosystems of North America found that as C mineralization rates increased, the abundance of Acidobacteria decreased, whereas the abundances of β-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes increased significantly (Fierer et al. 2007). In addition, other studies have reported that Acidobacteria were less abundant but β-Proteobacteria were more abundant in organic carbon-rich soils (McCaig et al. 1999, Axelrood et al. 2002, Fierer et al. 2007). Similar trends were found in our study: the abundance of Acidobacteria was negatively correlated with soil C concentration while that of β-Proteobacteria was positively correlated with soil C concentration. These results suggest that along with soil enzyme activity, the composition of bacterial communities is largely determined by C availability in soils.

The diversity of soil fungal communities was considerably lower than that of bacterial communities in this study (Table 2). In addition, there was no clear change in fungal community composition along the soil depth, whereas bacterial communities showed a distinct pattern across different soil depths. In the fallow field we studied, bacterial communities were more diverse and mediate C, N, and P cycling. Fungi are expected to be more abundant in forest ecosystems where recalcitrant substrates are abundant because they play key roles in decomposition of recalcitrant matter including lignin and cellulose (Aislabie and Deslippe 2013). Therefore, it is likely that the nature of our field site accounts for the higher diversity and stronger pattern along the soil depth of bacterial communities.

Within the fungal community, Ascomycota was most abundant and this was followed by Basidiomycota (Fig. 3b). Ascomycota are known as the largest fungal phylum, and most of them are saprotrophic and have a wide variety of enzymes that degrade recalcitrant substrates such as cellulose, keratin, and lignin; consequently, Ascomycota play critical roles in nutrient cycling in soil ecosystems (Aislabie and Deslippe 2013). The Basidiomycota are the second largest fungal phylum, and they are commonly known as spore-forming on the basidia during sexual reproduction and also produce mushrooms. Moreover, others are important decomposers; the families of rot fungi, such as “soft,” “brown,” and “white,” produce peroxide and enzymes to degrade recalcitrant plant compounds including cellulose and lignin (Aislabie and Deslippe 2013). The dominance of two fungal groups found in our study site reflect that reported in other soil ecosystems. The PCoA results showed that the bacterial communities were distinct at each soil depth, whereas fungal communities of 0–60 cm soil depth were clustered (Fig. 6). These results are consistent with the analyses of bacterial and fungal communities at the phylum and class level (Figs. 3, 4, and 5).

Conclusions

Our study shows that soil microbial community composition and function, determined by pyrosequencing and soil enzyme analyses, are distinct at different soil depths and this was more prominent for bacterial communities than for fungal communities. Soil C concentration that indicates the substrate availability for microorganisms is likely to be a major factor that accounts for soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition at this site. Metagenomics study like ours, along with other studies on microbial functions, is expected to further our understanding regarding the function and composition of soil microbial communities at different soil depths.

Abbreviations

ITS: 

Internal transcribed spacer

OTU: 

Operational taxonomic units

PCoA: 

Principal coordinates analysis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is supported by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) as the “Korea-CO2 Storage Environmental Management (K-COSEM) Research Program (Project No. 2014001810002).”

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

DK conducted the enzyme assay, analyzed the enzyme assay and pyrosequencing data, and wrote parts of the manuscript. GY guided the field work and provided data on the soil characteristics. SY and SJ selected the study site and guided the field survey. HC designed this study and wrote parts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University
(2)
Department of Environmental Science and Environmental Engineering, Kyung Hee University
(3)
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University
(4)
GeoGreen21 Co. Ltd.

References

  1. Agnelli, A., Ascher, J., Corti, G., Ceccherini, M. T., Nannipieri, P., & Pietramellara, G. (2004). Distribution of microbial communities in a forest soil profile investigated by microbial biomass, soil respiration and DGGE of total and extracellular DNA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 859–868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aislabie, J., & Deslippe, J. R. (2013). Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. In J. R. Dymond (Ed.), Ecosystem services in New Zealand: Conditions and trends (pp. 143–161). Lincoln: Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrood, P. E., Chow, M. L., Radomski, C. C., McDermott, J. M., & Davies, J. (2002). Molecular characterization of bacterial diversity from British Columbia forest soils subjected to disturbance. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 48, 655–674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldrian, P., Kolarik, M., Stursova, M., Kopecky, J., Valaskova, V., Vetrovsky, T., Zifcakova, L., Snajdr, J., Ridl, J., Vlcek, C., & Voriskova, J. (2012). Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME Journal, 6, 248–258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blume, E., Bischoff, M., Reichert, J. M., Moorman, T., Konopka, A., & Turco, R. F. (2002). Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Applied Soil Ecology, 20, 171–181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, H. L., Bruns, M. A., Schultz, M. J., Moore, J., Mathur, C. F., & Brantley, S. L. (2005). The coupling of biological iron cycling and mineral weathering during saprolite formation, Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico. Geobiology, 3, 247–260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun, J., Kim, K. Y., Lee, J. H., & Choi, Y. (2010). The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX titanium pyrosequencer. BMC Microbiology, 10, 101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Eilers, K. G., Debenport, S., Anderson, S., & Fierer, N. (2012). Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 50, 58–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fierer, N., Schimel, J. P., & Holden, P. A. (2003). Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 167–176.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fierer, N., Jackson, J. A., Vilgalys, R., & Jackson, R. B. (2005). Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 4117–4120.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., & Jackson, R. B. (2007). Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology, 88, 1354–1364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goberna, M., Insam, H., Klammer, S., Pascual, J. A., & Sanchez, J. (2005). Microbial community structure at different depths in disturbed and undisturbed semiarid mediterranean forest soils. Microbial Ecology, 50, 315–326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2010). Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME Journal, 4, 17–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansel, C., Fendorf, S., Jardine, P., & Francis, C. (2008). Changes in bacterial and archaeal community structure and functional diversity along a geochemically variable soil profile. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74, 1620–1633.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Huber, T., Faulkner, G., & Hugenholtz, P. (2004). Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 20, 2317–2319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hur, M., Kim, Y., Song, H. R., Kim, J. M., Choi, Y. I., & Yi, H. (2011). Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 7611–7619.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, B. S., Kim, J. N., Yoon, S. H., Chun, J., & Cerniglia, C. E. (2012a). Impact of enrofloxacin on the human intestinal microbiota revealed by comparative molecular analysis. Anaerobe, 18, 310–320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, O. S., Cho, Y. J., Lee, K., Yoon, S. H., Kim, M., Na, H., Park, S. C., Jeon, Y. S., Lee, J. H., Yi, H., Won, S., & Chun, J. (2012b). Introducing Eztaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 62, 716–721.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. LaMontagne, M., Schimel, J., & Holden, P. (2003). Comparison of subsurface and surface soil bacterial communities in California grassland as assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes. Microbial Ecology, 46, 216–227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McCaig, A. E., Glover, L. A., & Prosser, J. I. (1999). Molecular analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity in unimproved and improved upland grass pastures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 1721–1730.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Nannipieri, P., Ascher, J., Ceccherini, M. T., Landi, L., Pietramellara, G., & Renella, G. (2003). Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 655–670.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rumpel, C., & Kogel-Knabner, I. (2011). Deep soil organic matter-a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant and Soil, 338, 143–158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Saiya-Cork, K. R., Sinsabaugh, R. L., & Zak, D. R. (2002). The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1309–1315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sengupta, A., & Dick, W. A. (2015). Bacterial community diversity in soil under two tillage practices as determined by pyrosequencing. Microbial Ecology, 70, 853–859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stursova, M., & Baldrian, P. (2011). Effects of soil properties and management on the activity of soil organic matter transforming enzymes and the quantification of soil-bound and free activity. Plant and Soil, 338, 99–110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Trumbore, S. (2000). Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications, 10, 399–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Will, C., Thurmer, A., Wollherr, A., Nacke, H., Herold, N., Schrumpf, M., Gutknecht, J., Wubet, T., Buscot, F., & Daniel, R. (2010). Horizon-specific bacterial community composition of German grassland soils, as revealed by pyrosequencing-based analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 6751–6759.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu, X., Thornton, P. E., & Post, W. M. (2013). A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 737–749.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement