Skip to main content

Small-scale spatial genetic structure of Asarum sieboldii metapopulation in a valley

Abstract

Background

Asarum sieboldii Miq., a species of forest understory vegetation, is an herbaceous perennial belonging to the family Aristolochiaceae. The metapopulation of A. sieboldii is distributed sparsely and has a short seed dispersal distance by ants as their seed distributor. It is known that many flowers of A. sieboldii depend on self-fertilization. Because these characteristics can affect negatively in genetic structure, investigating habitat structure and assessment of genetic structure is needed. A total of 27 individuals in a valley were sampled for measuring genetic diversity, genetic distance, and genetic differentiation by RAPD-PCR.

Results

The habitat areas of A. sieboldii metapopulation were relatively small (3.78~33.60 m2) and population density was very low (five to seven individuals in 20×20 m quadrat). The habitat of A. sieboldii was a very shady (relative light intensity = 0.9%) and mature forest with a high evenness value (J = 0.81~0.99) and a low dominance value (D = 0.19~0.28). The total genetic diversity of A. sieboldii was quite high (h = 0.338, I = 0.506). A total of 33 band loci were observed in five selected primers, and 31 band loci (94%) were polymorphic. However, genetic differentiation along the valley was highly progressed (Gst = 0.548, Nm = 0.412). The average genetic distance between subpopulations was 0.387. The results of AMOVA showed 52.77% of variance occurs among populations, which is evidence of population structuring.

Conclusions

It is expected that a small-scale founder effect had occurred, an individual spread far from the original subpopulation formed a new subpopulation. However, geographical distance between individuals would have been far and genetic flow occurred only within each subpopulation because of the low density of population. This made significant genetic distance between the original and new population by distance. Although genetic diversity of A. sieboldii metapopulation is not as low as concerned, the subpopulation of A. sieboldii can disappear by stochastic events due to small subpopulation size and low density of population. To prevent genetic isolation and to enhance the stable population size, conservative efforts such as increasing the size of each subpopulation or the connection between subpopulations are needed.

Background

Forest understory vegetation is an important component of the forest ecosystem. It functions as a key factor in controlling microbial, chemical, and physical mechanisms during soil organic matter formation and helps decomposing leaves to increase the accumulation of carbon and nitrogen (Qiao et al. 2014). In addition, forest understory vegetation is composed of various plant species and contributes to the enhancement of forest biodiversity by providing habitats to numerous animals. These forest understory herbs are vulnerable to environmental change because their population densities can increase slowly due to slow growth and reproduction rates. Therefore, they are slow to reoccupy suitable habitats once extirpated or greatly reduced in population numbers (Meier et al. 1995).

Asarum sieboldii Miq., a species of forest understory vegetation, is an herbaceous perennial belonging to the family Aristolochiaceae. It grows in a mountain valley and a shaded slope of the forest in Republic of Korea, Prismorsky Krai of Russia, Japan, and eastern China (GBIF Secretariat 2021). Asarum sieboldii is famous for its medicinal properties in East Asia. It has been widely used in traditional medical practices for curing inflammation and ache in China, Korea, and Japan (Yamaki et al. 1996). Particularly, the dried root of A. sieboldii was called “Seshin” in Korea. It contains asarinin and aristolochic acid.

The flower of A. sieboldii is protogynous which the pistil matures first and then the stamen matures. At the first stage of flowering, pistils mature before stamens mature, and cross-pollination with pollen of other individuals occurs by ants or flies. During the second stage of flowering, stamens with the opened anther fold upwards and directly contact the pistils to enable self-pollination (Nesterova and Nakonechnaya 2018). Wang and Gao (2012) estimated that A. sieboldii is mainly pollinated by natural self-pollination and cross-pollination is less likely to occur than selfing. If the plant propagates mainly by self-pollination for a long time, it is expected to have a negative impact on the genetic diversity and environmental adaptation of plants. According to the “dead-end hypothesis” of Stebbins (1957), a population that reproduces through selfing can accumulate deleterious mutations (Lynch et al. 1995) and may result in the loss of genetic diversity to adapt to changing environmental conditions (Awad and Roze 2018). Short seed dispersal distance of A. sieboldii can also negatively affect genetic diversity. The seed of A. sieboldii has elaiosomes, which attract ants as seed dispersal mediators. Ants move the seed of A. sieboldii to their nest to eat elaiosome. However, the seed dispersal distance of ants is shorter than other insect dispersal mediators with less than 1 m (Palfi et al. 2017). Besides, the population of Asarum species are known to have scattered and discontinuous distribution pattern with small population size and have low population density (So and Kim 2013). These population inhabitation and reproduction characteristics are known to increase genetic drift and affect genetic structure and diversity (Llorens et al. 2017), which could lead to the risk of an extinction. To conserve A. sieboldii population as a component of understory vegetation, assessment of the genetic structure is needs to proceed.

Also, Asarum species are known as a food source specific to the larvae of Luehdorfia puziloi (Papilionidae) (Shin 1991). Luehdorifa puziloi is an important pollinator of spring ephemeral herb Erythronium japonicum (Liliaceae) (Kawano and Nagai 1982). Adult L. puziloi individuals visit E. japonicum for pollination with nectar in the spring, and they lays eggs on the leaves of Asarum species when perianths of E. japonicum flower begin to fall. Luehdorfia puziloi is an important species as a “seasonal notification species,” and adult emergence timing in early spring gets faster under the warmer soil temperature with global warming in the Republic of Korea (Kim and Nam 2018). Because phenological shift of each species is affected differently under altered climate condition (Kharouba and Vellend 2015), the interaction between Asarum species and L. puziloi also could be affected under climate change. Therefore, assessment of the population characteristics of Asarum species is important to understand the interaction with L. puziloi, which have the host specificity of larvae.

In previous preliminary studies, the genetic diversity of A. sieboldii population in eastern China was low and it was found that the differentiation by genetic drift was progressed to some extent (Liu et al. 2007). And also, a very low level of allozyme polymorphism was observed in the population of A. sieboldii in the Primorsky region of Russia (Nakonechnaya and Koren 2017). Because previous preliminary studies did not consider habitat characteristics of A. sieboldii and having problems with finding appropriate markers to measure the genetic diversity of A. sieboldii, estimating accurate genetic diversity and structure of A. sieboldii is needed. If the low genetic diversity of A. sieboldii is due to the self-pollination and the sparse population distribution, it is expected that A. sieboldii in South Korea also have low genetic diversity. However, the study on A. sieboldii in South Korea has focused on phylogenetics and medicine, and there is a lack of information on life history and genetic diversity. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the habitat characteristics of A. sieboldii metapopulation in Eobi valley, a habitat where A. sieboldii is relatively continuously distributed. Also, this study will identify genetic structure and measure genetic diversity of A. sieboldii metapopulation in the Eobi valley.

Results

Habitat characteristics

At the survey site, the habitat area of each A. sieboldii subpopulation was relatively small (3.78~33.60 m2) and population density was very low. In the 20×20 m quadrat of each study site, only five to seven A. sieboldii individuals were observed (Table 1). The relative light intensity of A. sieboldii habitat was very low which ranged from 0.34 to 1.21%. According to the vegetation survey, from 22 to 34 species appeared in each subpopulation. The number of emerged plant species was lowest at EB4 with 22 species, whereas highest at EB5 with 34 species (Table 2). A total of 61 species appeared among five sites. Shannon-Wiener species diversity index (H′) ranged from 0.56 to 3.19 for each layer of the site. Pielou’s evenness index (J) ranged from 0.81 to 0.99 for each layer of the site. Species richness index (R) ranged from 6.52 to 9.32 for each site. Dominance index (D) of each site ranged from 0.19 to 0.28. Dominant species of each site were [EB1: tree layer-Acer pseudosieboldianum, subtree layer-A. pseudosieboldianum, shrub layer-A. pseudosieboldianum, herb layer-Actinidia arguta], [EB2: tree layer-Carpinus cordata, subtree layer-C. cordata, shrub layer-Weigela subsessilis, herb layer-A. arguta], [EB3: tree layer-Acer pictum var. mono, subtree layer-A. arguta and A. pseudosieboldianum, shrub layer-A. pseudosieboldianum, Staphylea bumalda, Stephanandra incisa and Lespedeza maximowiczii, herb layer-A. arguta], [EB4: tree layer-C. cordata, subtree layer-C. cordata and A. pseudosieboldianum, shrub layer-A. arguta and Deutzia grandiflora, herb layer-Pseudostellaria heterophylla and Polystichum tripteron], and [EB5: tree layer-Cornus controversa, subtree layer-A. pseudosieboldianum, shrub layer-W. subsessilis, herb layer-Hydrangea serrata var. acuminate and S. incisa] (Table S1).

Table 1 The information of five studied A. sieboldii subpopulations (EB1~EB5) of the Eobi valley
Table 2 Diversity parameters of studied sites of A. sieboldii habitat in Eobi valley

Genetic diversity within subpopulations

A total of 33 band loci were observed in five selected primers, and 31 band loci (94%) were polymorphic (Table 3). Two band loci (6.5%) were only observed in the EB5 subpopulation. Average Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon’s information index (I) of each subpopulation were 0.153 and 0.225, respectively (Fig. 1). Subpopulations of EB4 and EB1 showed the highest (EB4: h = 0.202; I = 0.296) and the lowest (EB1: h = 0.125; I = 0.176) intra-subpopulation genetic diversity, respectively. Nei’s gene diversity and Shannon’s information index of the total Eobi valley metapopulation were 0.338 and 0.506, respectively.

Table 3 The information about RAPD primers and amplified fragments
Fig. 1
figure1

Genetic diversity within five subpopulations of A. sieboldii in the study site. h: Nei’s gene diversity index (Nei 1973), I: Shannon’s information index (Lewontin 1972)

Genetic distance between subpopulations

The average genetic distance between subpopulations calculated by Nei’s genetic distance (Nei 1972) was 0.330. Distance between EB1 and EB5 showed the longest (0.680), whereas distance between EB2 and EB3 showed the shortest distance (0.084) (Table 4). In the UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s genetic distance, EB5 established an outgroup as branched before the other 4 subpopulations, followed by EB4 (Fig. 2). EB2 and EB3 made a cluster. Genetic differentiation (Gst) (Nei 1973) between subpopulations was 0.548. Genetic flow (Nm) (McDermott and McDonald 1993) estimated by genetic differentiation was 0.412. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al. 1992) showed that 52.77% of variance was attributable to between-population differences. Within population variation was accounted for 47.23% of the genetic diversity (Table 5).

Table 4 Nei’s genetic identity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal) among subpopulations (Nei 1972)
Fig. 2
figure2

UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s genetic distance

Table 5 Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 27 individuals of A. sieboldii using 5 polymorphic RAPD markers (Excoffier et al. 2005)

All population was assigned to one group (calculated after 10,000 permutations)

Discussion

In the habitat of A. sieboldii in the Eobi valley, diverse forest plant species were established. High Pielou’s evenness index means that plant species in A. sieboldii habitat in the Eobi valley are evenly distributed and in a state of mutual competition (Table 2). According to Whittaker (1965), a dominance index below 0.3 indicates plant species are evenly distributed and in a state of mutual competition. It means A. sieboldii habitat is evenly dominated by many plant species (Table 2). In other words, the habitat of A. sieboldii in the Eobi valley is a very mature forest with a high evenness value and a low dominance value. The extremely low relative light intensity of the Eobi valley indicates that A. sieboldii habitat has a high canopy closure (Table 1). It means A. sieboldii is located in a very shady forest and has a high shade tolerance.

Genetic diversity of A. sieboldii was quite higher than expected. Nei’s gene diversity of the total A. sieboldii metapopulation (h = 0.338) was higher than average genetic diversity of perennial herbs (h = 0.25; Nybom 2004) and annual Persicaria thunbergii (h = 0.297; Nam et al. 2016) (Fig. 1). It was higher than genetic diversity of herbs using both cross-fertilization and self-fertilization (0.18) (Nybom 2004). Also, it was much higher than the genetic diversity of Aristolochia contorta, the same member of Aristolochiaceae (h = 0.1552, I = 0.2370) (Nam et al. 2020). Genetic diversity of A. sieboldii was measured higher than previous studies of Liu et al. (2007) and Nakonechnaya and Koren (2017). In the study of Nakonechnaya and Koren (2017), which measured genetic diversity of A. sieboldii using allozyme marker, all loci were monomorphic, which showed that allozyme was not the proper marker for identifying genetic diversity of A. sieboldii. Liu et al. (2007) conducted study in a very wide range of eastern China and Qinling-Dabashan district. A large difference in the scale of the experiment seems to have made a difference in the level of genetic diversity. Although genetic diversity was studied in a narrow range of study sites, A. sieboldii showed a quite high level of genetic diversity. It is estimated that although A. sieboldii is self-compatible, it is more likely to be an outcrosser that relies on cross-fertilization in the present study. Sexual recombination through cross-fertilization can contribute to allelic richness. It seems necessary to explore the exact proportion of self-fertilization and cross-fertilization of A. sieboldii in the following study.

On the other hand, genetic differentiation was highly progressed (Gst = 0.548) compared to the genetic differentiation of perennial herb (0.19). It is higher than the Gst of herbaceous plants using both self and cross-fertilization (0.20) (Nybom 2004). The results of AMOVA showed 52.77% of variance occurs among populations (Table 5), which is evidence of population structuring. It means the A. sieboldii metapopulation in Eobi valley has genetically significantly differentiated despite the narrow range. It is estimated there was little genetic flow (Nm = 0.412) between subpopulations, which means that A. sieboldii metapopulation of the Eobi valley formed a spatial genetic structure (Doligez et al. 1998).

Asarum sieboldii showed a higher level of intra-subpopulation genetic diversity and inter-subpopulation genetic differentiation. At the scale of a valley in a mountain, these results suggest that the low density of population (So and Kim 2013) shaped the spatial genetic structure of A. sieboldii. It is expected that A. sieboldii population experienced small-scale founder effect. Seeds may have spread far from the original population occasionally and formed new populations along the valley. But because of the low density of population, geographical distance between individuals would have been far. Therefore, genetic flow occurred only within subpopulation level. It will make significant genetic distance between the original and new population by distance. Repetition of these situations over time and generations would have genetically structured A. sieboldii metapopulation by geographical distance. Subpopulations EB1~EB5 showed the isolated form by geographical distance along the valley (Fig. 2). The isolation by geographical distance seemed to make the lower-level genetic flow and a higher level of metapopulation-level genetic diversity in the present study.

This study is meaningful in that it revealed the pattern of A. sieboldii distributed along the valley although it was conducted within a narrow range. It has revealed how the genetic structure of A. sieboldii, which have scattered population and sparsely distributed individuals, is formed. Although the genetic diversity of A. sieboldii population is not as low as concerned, without subsequent genetic management, genetic isolation is worried due to high genetic differentiation and small subpopulation size. Small population size can impact the population negatively by genetic drift and diminish plant fitness. Also, it makes the population vulnerable to environmental and genetic stochastic events (Wallace 2002). Due to the small subpopulation size and low density of population, the subpopulation of A. sieboldii can disappear in an instant by stochastic events. Because A. sieboldii is an understory herb, it will take a long time to reoccupy its habitat again if it disappears (Meier et al. 1995). Also, because of the highly structured metapopulation, the population can be genetically fragmented. Population fragmentation decreases the evolutionary fitness by decreasing genetic diversity and outcrossing rate (Aguilar et al. 2008). To maintain A. sieboldii population, each subpopulation should have a stable population size to prevent stochastic disappearance. An effort for making genetic flow between subpopulations is required to maintain the genetic diversity and variation of A. sieboldii by preventing genetic drift. When planning a conservation strategy, it is necessary to consider the fertilization and seed dispersion mechanism of A. sieboldii for increasing genetic flow between subpopulations. To prevent genetic isolation and to enhance stable population size, the habitat of A. sieboldii must be preserved. The valley area should be free from forest destruction, and minimizing damage from neighborhood resident or visitors is needed. Also, monitoring changes in genetic variation of the subpopulations, particularly the loss of alleles and effective population size is required. Further analysis determining the rate of cross-fertilization and seed dispersal pattern of A. sieboldii will be helpful.

Conclusions

Although this study was conducted within a narrow range, it is meaningful that it revealed how the genetic structure of A. sieboldii, which have scattered population and sparsely distributed individuals, is formed. By the result of this study, we can see that A. sieboldii in the Eobi valley have quite high genetic diversity, but genetic differentiation has progressed significantly and spatial genetic structure formed depending on the geographical distance. This means that although genetic diversity is high at the overall metapopulation level, there is little genetic flow between subpopulations, and genetically very different subpopulations were formed. If the present situation continues without an increase in the connection between subpopulations, genetic fragmentation of A. sieboldii subpopulation is concerned. Due to the small population size, the subpopulation can disappear in an instant by the genetic and environmental stochastic event. To stabilize A. sieboldii population, conservative efforts are needed, such as increasing the size of each subpopulation or the connection between subpopulations. Monitoring of population size and genetic variation, and protecting the habitat of A. sieboldii from forest destruction is needed. It should be accompanied with understanding the fertilization and seed dispersion mechanism of A. sieboldii.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites and field survey

A field survey was conducted in Eobi valley at Mt. Eobi, Seorak-myeon, Gapyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do (37°34′N, 127°30~31′E) in July 2020 to investigate the community and population genetic structure of A. sieboldii along the valley (Fig. 3). Among the A. sieboldii subpopulations distributed along the valley, five sites (EB1~5; EB, Eobi valley) were selected. Because A. sieboldii individuals were distributed sparsely, the sites were randomly selected at intervals of 50 m altitude. At the sampling site, latitude, longitude, altitude, slope, and relative light intensity were measured. Relative light intensity was calculated by the proportion of the light intensity of the herb layer in sampling sites in neighboring open spaces using a portable photometer (LI-250, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Vegetation survey was conducted by Braun-Blanquet’s method (Braun-Blanquet 1964). Because A. sieboldii was distributed sparsely in a random pattern, a 20 m × 20 m size quadrat was set to fully cover the width of the valley. The vegetation is divided into four layers (tree, subtree, shrub, and herb). Dominance and abundance indices were recorded in six levels (+, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Shannon-Wiener diversity index (Pielou 1969), species richness (Margalef 1958), evenness (Pielou 1975), and dominance (Mcnaughton 1967) were calculated from the vegetation survey. One leaf per each A. sieboldii individual was collected at the site and used for DNA extraction. Five or six leaves per subpopulation were collected, therefore a total of 27 leaves were stored at -80°C before DNA extraction.

Fig. 3
figure3

Location of study sites in the Eobi valley. A total of five A. sieboldii subpopulations (EB1~EB5) were surveyed

DNA extraction

Total genomic DNA of A. sieboldii was extracted from 27 leaf samples collected from five subpopulations. Leaf samples were ground with liquid nitrogen by mortar and pestle, and genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, NRW, Germany). After extraction, the concentration of extracted gDNA was quantified by Nanodrop Onec (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA products were diluted by triple distilled water to the concentration of 40 ng/μl and used for the subsequent amplification reaction.

RAPD analysis

Of the total 11 random primers, five primers which showed polymorphic bands consistently in repeated experiments were selected (Table 3). Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was conducted from PCR product in a final volume of 10 μl containing 2 μl of template DNA (40 ng/μl), 1 μl of 10x PCR buffer, 2 μl of dNTP mix (2.5 mM each), 2 μl of preselected primer (10 pmole/μl), 0.2 μl of BS eTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl; Biosesang, Seongnam, ROK) and 2.8 μl of triple distilled water. Amplification was performed in MiniAmp™ Plus Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 45 s of denaturation at 95°C, 45 s of primer annealing at 32°C, 1 min 35 s of extension at 72°C, and final extension step at 72°C for 2 min (Nam et al. 2016). Amplified products were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained by GelRed™ (Biotium, Heyward, CA, USA).

Analysis of marker polymorphism

The clear presence and absence of a single fragment at each polymorphic loci were scored as 1 and 0 within the binary matrix, respectively. Scored data were used to calculate the genetic diversity of intra-and inter-population. Number of polymorphic loci, Nei’s gene diversity (h; Nei 1973), Shannon’s information index (I) (Lewontin 1972) were calculated as indices of intrapopulation genetic diversity. Also, UPGMA dendrogram from calculated Nei’s genetic distance (Nei 1972) was analyzed genetic differentiation of interpopulation by using Popgene32 software (Yeh et al. 2000). The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al. 1992) was conducted to detect population differentiation and structuring. We carried out AMOVA by treated RAPD phenotype as a haplotype (Huff et al. 1993), assigning all populations to one group. AMOVA analysis was undertaken by using the software ARLEQUIN ver. 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier et al. 2005).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(24):5177–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Awad DA, Roze D. Effects of partial selfing on the equilibrium genetic variance, mutation load, and inbreeding depression under stabilizing selection. Evolution. 2018;72(4):751–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13449.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Wien: Springer; 1964.

  4. Doligez A, Baril C, Joly HI. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure with nonuniform distribution of individuals. Genetics. 1998;148(2):905–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/148.2.905.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2005;1:47–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131(2):479–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/131.2.479.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. GBIF Secretariat. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei Accessed 16 May 2021.

  8. Huff DR, Peakall R, Smouse PE. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;86(8):927–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211043.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawano S, Nagai Y. Further observations on the reproductive biology of Erythronium japonicum Decne (Liliaceae). J Phytogeogr Taxo. 1982;30:90–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kharouba HM, Vellend M. Flowering time of butterfly nectar food plants is more sensitive to temperature than the timing of butterfly adult flight. J Anim Ecol. 2015;84(5):1311–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim IK, Nam JW. Changes in adult emergence timing of Luehdorfia puziloi (Erschoff) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) responding to temperature rise in South Korea. Poster session presented at KSCC International Conference 2018, July. (in Korean)

  12. Lewontin RC. The Apportionment of Human Diversity. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC, editors. Evolutionary Biology. New York: Springer; 1972. p. 381–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Z, Kondo N, Xu T, Cai S. A preliminary study on genetic diversity of Asarum sieboldii Miq. Sci Pap Online. 2007;6:11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Llorens TM, Tapper SL, Coates DJ, McArthur S, Hankinson M, Byrne M. Does population distribution matter? Influence of a patchy versus continuous distribution on genetic patterns in a wind-pollinated shrub. J Biogeogr. 2017;44(2):361–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat. 1995;146(4):489–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/285812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Margalef R. Information theory in biology. Gen Syst. 1958;3:36–71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McDermott JM, McDonald BA. Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31(1):353–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.002033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McNaughton SJ. Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland. Nature. 1967;216(5111):168–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/216168b0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meier AJ, Bratton SP, Duffy DC. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecol Appl. 1995;5(4):935–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakonechnaya OV, Koren OG. Genetic variability of Asarum sieboldii (Aristolochiaceae) in the population of Primorsky region. Bull KrasGAU. 2017;1:132–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nam BE, Nam JM, Kim JG. Effects of habitat differences on the genetic diversity of Persicaria thunbergii. J Ecol Environ. 2016;40(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-016-0012-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nam BE, Park HJ, Son GY, Kim JG. An analysis of the genetic diversity of a riparian marginal species, Aristolochia contorta. J Wet Res. 2020;22(2):100–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 1972;106(949):283–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70(12):3321–3. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nesterova SV, Nakonechnaya OV. Reproductive Biology of Asarum sieboldii Miq. Biol Bull. 2018;45(5):448–53. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359018050126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(5):1143–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Palfi Z, Spooner PG, Robinson W. Seed dispersal distances by ants increase in response to anthropogenic disturbances in Australian roadside environments. Front Ecol Evol. 2017;5:132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pielou EC. An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pielou EC. Ecological Diversity. New York: Wiley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Qiao Y, Miao S, Silva LC, Horwath WR. Understory species regulate litter decomposition and accumulation of C and N in forest soils: A long-term dual-isotope experiment. For Ecol Manage. 2014;329:318–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin YH. Coloured Butterflies of Korea. Seoul: Academy press; 1991. (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  32. So S, Kim M. Genetic variation and population structure of Asarum misandrum (Aristolochiaceae) in Korea. Korean J Plant Taxon. 2013;43(3):181–7. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2013.43.3.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stebbins GL. Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am Nat. 1957;91(861):337–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/281999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wallace LE. Examining the effects of fragmentation on genetic variation in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae): inferences from allozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Plant Species Biol. 2002;17(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-1984.2002.00072.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Gao Y. Study on spontaneous self-pollination mechanism of Asarum sieboldii. Hunan Agric Sci Technol. 2012;13(1):127–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Whittaker RH. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science. 1965;147(3655):250–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3655.250.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamaki K, Terabayashi S, Okada M, Pak JH. A new species and a new variety of Asarum (Aristolochiaceae) from Korea. J Jpn Bot. 1996;71:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle TJ, Ye Z, Xiyan JM. PopGene32, Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis, version 1.32. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Yewon Seo of Siheung high school and EunSu Kim of Shincheon high school for helping with band scoring.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant (NRF-2018R1A2B2002267) of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIT), Republic of Korea, and R&E program of Siheung Education Institute for Gifted.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HJJ performed the field survey, analyzed experimental data, and wrote the manuscript draft. JGK conceived the research idea, performed the field survey, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Geun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Constancy table of vegetation survey conducted by Braun-Blanquet’s method (Braun-Blanquet 1964).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, H.J., Kim, J.G. Small-scale spatial genetic structure of Asarum sieboldii metapopulation in a valley. j ecology environ 45, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00186-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Founder effect
  • Genetic differentiation
  • Genetic diversity
  • Genetic fragmentation
  • RAPD
  • Self-compatibility
  • Understory herb