From: How effective are artificial nests in attracting bees? A review
Reference | Country | Place | Occupation rate | Species | Material | Volume | Entrance | Key results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Barron et al., 2000) | New Zealand | Farm | 13% | Bumblebee | Wood | - | 2.5 | In the intensive farms, occupation was lower than less disturbed sites. |
(Inoue et al., 1993) | Indonesia | Forest | 6% | Trigona minangkabau | Wood | 0.7, 2 | - | Arboreal ants occupied one-half of artificial nest sites. |
(Coelho and Sullivan, 1994) | USA | Forest | 30% | Honeybee | Wood | - | 6 | The nest boxes were not attractive to bees while the entrances were open. |
(Prange and Nelson, 2007) | USA | Forest | 10% | Honeybee | Wood | 6.7 | 3.1 | Our observations supported the theory that minimum acceptable cavity volume varies geographically. |
(Oliveira et al., 2013) | Brazil | Forest | 10. 2% | 9 Stingless bees | Cardboard, Plastic | 0.5, 1, 2, 3 | - | Most swarms chose the largest container (3 L). |
(Veiga et al., 2013) | Kenya | Forest | 31% | Native bee | Wood | 3, 7, 15 | 0.45 | Bees were more abundant in forest boxes than savannas. |
(Silva et al., 2014) | Brazil | Forest | 0.035% | Honeybee and 5 Meliponini | Plastic | 1, 2, 3 | - | The present study suggests the existence of a minimum volume threshold of approximately 1 L for most local species of stingless bees. |
(Efstathion et al., 2015) | Brazil | Forest | 51% | Tetragonisca sp, Honeybee | Wood | 2.7 | 2.5 | Trap boxes may be effective at reducing the number of bird nest boxes colonized by invasive Africanized honeybees and wasps. |
(Le Roux et al., 2016) | Australia | Forest | 12.5% | Honeybee | - | - | 2, 3, 5.5, 9.5, 11.5 | Nest boxes with small (20 and 35 mm), intermediate (55 and 75 mm), and large (95 and 115 mm) entrance sizes were predominately occupied by Apis mellifera. |
(Arena et al., 2018b) | Brazil | Forest | 5.5% | Scaptotrigona postica | Plastic | 3 | 2.5 | We suggest reducing the diameter of the PVC pipes (nest entrances). |
(Arena et al., 2018a) | Brazil | Forest | 5.5% | Stingless bee | Plastic | 3 | 2.5 | Bees showed a preference for occupying artificial shelters that were located in the patches’ cores. |
(Guimaraes-Brasil et al., 2020) | Brazil | Forest | 6% | Apidae, Megachilidae | Wood | 1.5, 6 | 1,2 | Only nest boxes with a volume of 1.5 L were occupied. |
(Berris and Barth, 2020) | Australia | Forest | 24% | Honeybee | Wood, PVC | - | - | Feral honeybees were less likely to occupy nest boxes made of PVC (5%). |
(Gaston et al., 2005) | UK | Urban | 0% | Bumblebee | Wood | - | 2 | No bumblebee nest sites of any of the three designs. |
(Lye et al., 2011) | UK | Urban | 3.1% | Bumblebee | Wood | 6 | 2, 12, 20 | Attempts to use domiciles for conservation or research in the UK are likely to be ineffective. |
(Johnson et al., 2019) | Canada | Urban | 13.3% | Bumblebee | Wood | 3, 6 | 2 | The majority of sites had at least one domicile occupied. |