Skip to main content

Table 2 Dry forest income contribution to household income in the selected kebeles

From: The role of dry land forests for climate change adaptation: the case of Liben Woreda, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia

Explanatory variables

Kebeles (mean ± standard deviation)

Overall (N = 74)

p value

Boba (N = 24)

Bulbul (N = 30)

Melka-Guba (N = 20)

Age

44.4 ± 15.50

42.8 ± 14.91

43.6 ± 11.19

43.5 ± 14.04

0.122

Size of family

6.8 ± 2.92

6.6 ± 2.37

7.7 ± 1.73

6.9 ± 2.43

1.175

Land size (ha)

3.9 ± 2.16

3.75 ± 2.68

4.32 ± 2.19

3.94 ± 2.38

0.326

Dry forest income (ETB/year) (A)

177.5 ± 556.02

918.7 ± 1630.84

3512.4 ± 2634.52

1379.3 ± 2183.82

21.688*

Total income (ETB/year) (B)

177.5 ± 556.02

11,982.0 ± 18,464.99

23,287.9 ± 17,467.06

11,209.2 ± 17,180.86

13.250*

Income (B)–income (A)

0 ± 0.0

11,063.4 ± 17,763.0

19,775.5 ± 17,282.7

9829.8 ± 16,204.3

10.399*

  1. *The significance at p = 0.01. ETB, Ethiopian birr